Condemning Hamas is Not Anti-Palestinian; Condemning Netanyahu is Not Anti-Semitic or Anti-Israeli

Web Editor

May 29, 2025

a man with a beard and glasses standing in front of a blue background with the words, el pasonista,

The Unfolding Crisis in Gaza: A Moral Imperative

Since October 2023, the reignited conflict between Hamas and escalated by Benjamin Netanyahu’s military campaign has resulted in over 54,000 Palestinian fatalities—more than 16,000 of whom are children—and over 123,000 injuries. Gaza has become an uninhabitable zone. This is not a war with clear objectives but a catastrophe fueled by extremism, repression, and demagoguery.

Key Figures and Their Stances

Former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert described the campaign in Gaza as a “purposeless war,” a cruel and criminal endeavor that shames those who still believe in Israeli democracy. Opposition leader Yair Golan denounced it as “a sane country does not kill children for sport.” Neither is anti-Semitic or anti-Israeli.

Hamas’ Role and the Subsequent Response

Hamas initiated this new wave of horror with its October 7, 2023 attack. The assault claimed 1,139 lives, including 71 foreigners, and resulted in 251 abductions. However, this does not justify Hamas’ subsequent indiscriminate retaliation. Hamas employs human shields, governs autocratically, and undermines the legitimate aspirations of the Palestinian people. Condemning Hamas is not being anti-Palestinian, and condemning Netanyahu is not being anti-Semitic or anti-Israeli. These distinctions are crucial.

Israeli Right’s Extremism

The Israeli right has crossed the line. Statements like those from former MK Moshe Feiglin—”every child in Gaza is the enemy”—or Minister of Finance Bezalel Smotrich, who boasts about wanting to “destroy everything,” do not represent the Israeli people or Judaism. They represent an extremist ideology using the state’s flag to justify barbarity.

Consequences for Israeli Soldiers and U.S. Repression

Israeli soldiers also bear the brunt of this conflict. At least 407 have died in Gaza since the invasion began, with over 850 casualties among Israel’s security forces since October. These deaths are directly the responsibility of Netanyahu and his ultra-right coalition, who initiated a war without strategy, merely to maintain political power.

Similarly, there is no justification for U.S. repression against those protesting the situation in Gaza since 2023. Thousands of students and activists have been detained, threatened, or silenced under an opportunistic definition of anti-Semitism. Foreign citizens have been deported.

Trump’s Role and Inaction

Trump, who promised to end the Gaza and Ukraine wars “in 24 hours,” has instead fueled both conflicts. Instead of negotiating, he posed for the cameras. His demagoguery is as dangerous as his inaction.

Key Questions and Answers

  • Q: Is condemning Hamas the same as being anti-Palestinian? A: No, condemning Hamas does not equate to being anti-Palestinian.
  • Q: Is criticizing Netanyahu equivalent to being anti-Semitic or anti-Israeli? A: No, criticizing Netanyahu’s policies does not mean one is anti-Semitic or anti-Israeli.
  • Q: What are the consequences of blurring justice with propaganda? A: Blurring justice with propaganda hinders the path to peace.
  • Q: Is defending Palestinian dignity the same as supporting Hamas? A: No, defending Palestinian dignity does not imply supporting Hamas.
  • Q: Does rejecting Netanyahu’s policies mean rejecting Israel? A: No, rejecting Netanyahu’s policies does not equate to rejecting Israel.

The tragedy in Gaza mirrors the failings of power: Hamas’ cynical violence, Netanyahu’s brutality, the U.S.’s repressive legalism, and Trump’s political opportunism. There is no neutral ground here. Condemning all of this is a moral imperative, not an ideological stance.