In the official history of Western medicine, there are abundant names that changed the course of things with a visible discovery: an organ, a lesion, or a function. However, there are characters whose contribution was not to discover something new in the body but to inaugurate a new way of looking at, measuring, and understanding it. Santorio Santorio (Sanctorius Sanctorius in Latin), a 17th-century Venetian physician, did not introduce a specialty or break with a dominant theory. What he did was simpler and perhaps more revolutionary: he set out to measure what the human body loses without leaving a trace, what escapes between sweat and breath.
A Silent Life Experiment
For years, Santorio turned his own life into a silent experiment. With a chair hanging from the ceiling connected to a platform that served as a balance, with an hourglass, and with instruments he modified or invented himself, he quantified changes in his body weight from daily activities performed on the platform. Today, his methods may seem rudimentary, but his logic is entirely modern: the body as a source of data, health as a dynamic balance, and disease as quantifiable deviation.
Reclaiming Santorio’s Perspective
This text reclaims the type of perspective that Santorio introduced in medicine: one that seeks patterns in the everyday; one that does not settle for merely listening to the body but attempts to count it. In an era where we carry sensors on our wrists and algorithms in our pockets, it may be time to return Santorio his rightful place: the first physician who understood that the invisible, too, can be measured. Yet, it is also an invitation to ponder a foundational paradox.
As documented by Teresa Hollerbach (2021), Santorio quantified the body but did not systematize his data; he measured for years without publishing the figures. What survived was the logic of the method, not empirical evidence. Yet, it was enough to transform the horizon of medical knowledge.
Santorio’s Background and Influence
Born in Capodistria (present-day Slovenia) in 1561, Santorio studied medicine at the University of Padua, one of Europe’s most innovative centers at the time. Although the medicine he received was still Galenic, focusing on humors and the “six non-natural things,” Padua offered freedom to question. Santorio certainly did, spending over three decades teaching medicine at the same university. Though he did not found his own school or gather a following, he significantly influenced how medicine began to rely on instruments and figures.
His most famous work, “Ars de Statica Medicina” (The Art of Statical Medicine, 1614), was republished multiple times, marking the beginning of a quantified approach to observing humans. Ironically, this work does not present numerical series or systematic tables; its language remains that of aphorisms and clinical experience. However, the method it supports is undoubtedly quantitative.
Measuring the Unseen
Santorio set up a system at his home that could be called a “continuous monitoring platform.” He measured food intake, excretion, perspiration, sleep; he monitored weight changes as he performed his daily life on the platform. From these data, he estimated that more than half of what the body eliminates occurs without being seen or smelled—this marked the first measurement, however trivial, of what Galen called “natural emanations” or “vapors,” which Santorio termed “insensible perspiration.”
This seemingly trivial finding can be considered an epistemological rupture. Santorio introduced the idea that physiological processes can be measured, that health can be observed from the margins, from small fluctuations, from the invisible. Instead of focusing on spectacular disease, he focused on the daily variability of a healthy body. Rather than interpreting qualitative signs, Santorio invented instruments to capture these invisible but present variations in the body’s functioning.
Reinterpreting Galenic Thought
In this endeavor, Santorio indirectly revisited a central notion of Galenic thought: the “latitude of health.” For Galen, health was not a fixed state but a dynamic balance among humors with an acceptable range of variability before disease manifested. Each body had a tolerance band, a margin within which changes could occur without altering the overall state. Santorio not only assumed this principle but took it further by attempting to observe and measure this variability.
He wanted to know how much weight is lost without illness, how the pulse varies with fasting, and how much perspiration occurs without fever. In this way, he tried to translate the previously philosophical idea into empirical and measurable terms.
Developing Measurement Instruments
To achieve this, Santorio developed and refined several instruments: the “pulsilogium” (precursor to the pulse rate meter), a clinical thermometer, measurement clocks, and manual registration systems. He was, in many senses, a human body engineer. Although his publications may not present data as explicit numbers, they are built on the experience of measurement. He thought numerically, even if he did not write with numbers.
A Methodological Perspective on Santorio’s Work
From a contemporary methodological viewpoint, we could say that Santorio conducted a longitudinal observational study with n=1. It was a systematic prospective follow-up without a control group or randomization, but with remarkable consistency and rigor for his time. In other words, it was not strictly experimental but introduced variations in his diet or environment to observe changes. His goal was to generate knowledge from personal experience, making him the first documented case of self-quantification or individual monitoring.
In this sense, he anticipates the personalized studies explored today in precision medicine.
Santorio’s Lasting Impact
Despite his ingenuity, Santorio was overshadowed in history by figures like Vesalius and Harvey from the University of Padua due to his less spectacular contributions. He did not discover internal circulation or dissect corpses with artistic virtuosity. He measured what was not visible, unnamed, or immediately impactful.
While Vesalio transformed the body by making it visible through autopsy, and Harvey reconfigured the body’s functioning by discovering systemic circulation, Santorio focused on what neither saw: the invisible fluctuations of a balanced living body.
Santorio’s Relevance in the 21st Century
In the 21st century, Santorio’s legacy reappears almost unnamed. Every time a smartwatch measures steps, sleep, or heart rate; every time an app monitors physiological patterns continuously, Santorio is there. Not as a brand or reference but as an origin. In a data-obsessed world, with digital medicine, biosensors, Santorio reminds us that measurement can also be a philosophical act—a way to understand the body not as a machine but as a dynamic, sensitive, and unpredictable system.
Pedagogical Epilogue: Why Teach Santorio Today
Recovering Santorio in medical education, as proposed by Teresa Hollerbach, is not a nostalgic gesture but an epistemological necessity. It teaches careful observation, disciplined recording, skepticism towards the obvious, and pattern-seeking in the minimal. His method does not compete with modern technology; it anticipates it. His figure does not represent the past but a future possibility: a medicine that learns to listen to the body’s daily quantifiable data rather than accumulating protocols.
In an era valuing personalized data, continuous monitoring, and understanding a healthy body as a source of knowledge, Santorio’s silent experiment ceases to be a mere curiosity and becomes a foundational act. In a society where everything is measured, Santorio reminds us that measurement can also be a way to look at the body differently and give meaning to quantification. Sometimes, the most revolutionary act is simply asking what happens in the body when nothing seems to be happening.
References
Hollerbach, T. (2021). Sanctorius Sanctorius and the Origins of Health Measurement. Berlin, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30118-6 (open access).
Reed, J. (2022). The weight of Qualities. Quantifying Temperament in Early Modern British Mathematical Medicine. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/oa-edit/10.4324/9781003258704-16/weight-qualities-julia-reed
Eknoyan, G. (1999). Santorio Sanctorius (1561–1636)–Founding Father of Metabolic Balance Studies. American Journal of Nephrology, 19(3), 226–233. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10213823/
*The author is a Professor of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, UNAM and an Emeritus Professor of Health Measurement Sciences, University of Washington.
The opinions expressed in this article do not represent the position of the institutions where the author works.
[email protected] ; [email protected]; @DrRafaelLozano
