Could Iran Alter Trump’s Agenda? The Looming Israel-Iran Conflict Poses Greater Risks

Web Editor

June 20, 2025

a man in a tie is smiling for the camera with a caption in spanish above him that reads, enrique cam

Public Opinion on Military Involvement in Israel-Iran Conflict

According to a recent survey by The Economist and YouGov, 60% of Americans believe the U.S. military should not intervene in the Israel-Iran conflict, with only 16% openly supporting such military action. Among Republicans, a majority of 53% opposes U.S. military intervention in the Middle East.

For context, a Gallup poll from April showed that 70% of Republicans supported President Trump’s tariff policy, despite understanding it would likely cause higher inflation.

Economic Concerns and Trump’s Agenda

The 2.4% general inflation in the U.S. in May masked the rising effects of increased tariffs on imported goods, as lower energy prices provided some cover. However, many analysts caution against premature celebration of tariffs’ price transfer to consumers, with the Federal Reserve warning that the consumer price index could return to 3%. The uncertainty surrounding potential price impacts on oil, gas, and gasoline is a significant concern.

Should Iran decide to attack the Arab oil supply routes, it would likely cause a rapid increase in hydrocarbon prices, affecting gasoline and transportation costs for both passengers and goods. Rising fuel costs could further push inflation, increasing business costs and complicating monetary policy.

With the U.S. economy in a fragile state, an increase in energy prices could double-impact by driving inflation and decreasing economic activity. This translates to negative consequences for Donald Trump’s political standing.

Trump’s Policy Reconsideration

A military conflict, especially with the scale of countries involved in the current Middle East situation, offers no positive outcomes. Trump may need to reconsider many of his announced policies if he ultimately decides on military action.

In such a scenario, Trump’s ambitious projects, like the purchase of Greenland, might face setbacks. He would likely need to moderate his trade war efforts to mitigate the negative economic consequences of a U.S.-Iran conflict.

Uncertainty Surrounding Trump’s Response

The economic implications of a deteriorating conflict scenario are as uncertain as the future of such a war. Trump’s reaction to further economic degradation remains unclear, adding another layer of complexity to the already challenging situation.