Mexico Demands Evidence from US Amid Money Laundering Accusations Against Financial Institutions

Web Editor

June 26, 2025

Mexico Demands Evidence from US Amid Money Laundering Accusations Against Financial Institutions

Background on the Accused Institutions

The United States Department of Treasury has leveled serious accusations against three Mexican financial institutions: two private capital banks and a significant online investment platform, Vector. These entities are primarily under scrutiny for their alleged links to groups involved in fentanyl trafficking.

US Accusations and Sanctions

According to the US financial authorities, these institutions are suspected of participating in money laundering activities that benefit fentanyl-trafficking groups. In response, the Department of Treasury has imposed sanctions prohibiting US financial institutions from transferring funds to CIBanco, Intercam, and Vector.

These sanctions will take effect 21 days after their publication in the Federal Register, as per a statement released on June 25.

New Powers Granted to the Treasury

These actions are the first steps by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) under the Fentanyl Sanctions Act and the Fend Off Fentanyl Act. These laws grant additional powers to the Treasury to combat money laundering associated with fentanyl and other synthetic opioids, including those trafficked by Mexican cartels.

Mexico’s Response

The Mexican Secretariat of Finance and Public Credit, led by Edgar Amador, responded firmly that there is no evidence to support the accusations. They emphasized their commitment to applying the full force of Mexican law if concrete evidence is provided.

Hacienda reported that the US Department of Treasury has yet to share any corroborating evidence. They noted that they had informed the Mexican Financial Intelligence Unit (UIF) and Hacienda about the alleged irregularities, requesting proof of links to illicit activities.

To date, no substantiating data has been received, according to Hacienda. The only verifiable information from the US Treasury relates to electronic transfers between these institutions and legally established Chinese companies.

Context of the Accusations

These accusations come amidst escalating criticisms and allegations against Mexico regarding drug cartel activities. The US Attorney General, Pam Bondi, even classified Mexico as an adversary on the same day.

Under Claudia Sheinbaum’s administration, Mexico has strived to deliver results in combating organized crime. This effort is a key argument used by the Secretary of Economy to persuade US counterparts to eliminate tariffs on steel and aluminum.

Implications and Next Steps

The reputational blow, though indirect, affects the entire Mexican financial system. The Mexican government, through Hacienda, UIF, and the National Banking and Securities Commission, faces a significant challenge to swiftly and effectively determine if the accused institutions are responsible.

The outcome will influence the cooperation and trust relationship between Mexico and the US, as well as public confidence in the Mexican financial system.

Key Questions and Answers

  • What are the accusations against? The US Department of Treasury has accused three Mexican financial institutions—two private capital banks and an important online investment platform, Vector—of money laundering related to fentanyl trafficking.
  • What actions has the US taken? The Department of Treasury has imposed sanctions, prohibiting US financial institutions from transferring funds to the accused Mexican banks.
  • How has Mexico responded? The Mexican Secretariat of Finance and Public Credit has stated there is no evidence to support the accusations and that they will apply Mexican law if concrete proof is provided.
  • What are the implications? These accusations, though not directly targeting the Mexican financial system, have the potential to impact public trust and market reactions.