Background on UNAM’s Recent Activism
After years of inactivity, the “OcupaChe” movement (officially known as the Justo Sierra Auditorium in the Faculty of Philosophy and Letters) was reactivated last week due to a specific context. The auditorium, previously occupied by anarchist groups and even narcomenudistas selling in the vicinity of UNAM, saw students from UNAM and possibly other universities gather to discuss their demands related to security, food, and study scholarships.
Parallel Events at Other Institutions
Simultaneously, seven faculties at UNAM were closed, two at the IPN (Polytechnic Institute of National Education), and three at UAM (Autonomous Metropolitan University). These closures can be attributed to the ongoing processes of appointing new directors and rectors. However, given that over 280 scholarships are provided to students at various levels (bachelor’s, undergraduate, and postgraduate) at UNAM, it is unsurprising that there has been activism. This represents roughly half of the student body receiving some form of financial, transportation, or monthly income assistance.
The Rector’s Response and Student Demands
In response to the student demands, the rector announced a commission to review existing scholarships and establish new agreements for improved services in cafeterias and dining halls for the upcoming semester.
Generational Shift and Sociodemographic Changes
The current activism at UNAM can be seen as a result of generational and sociodemographic shifts. In the 1960s, UNAM benefited from a single campus and the growth of a more democratic middle class. The CEU (Center for University Education) led to the emergence of scholars like Ordorica, Santos, and Imaz, advocating for a certain type of modernity rather than strict neoliberal policies.
Subsequently, the Mosh and “ad lateres” generations rejected modernization and even called for the destruction of UNAM. However, over the past 20 years, there had been relative calm, with the emergence of cafeterias and social spaces, alongside ongoing issues related to women’s empowerment and generational change.
The recent generation, comprising Millennials (Ys and Xs), presents a unique situation. Their language is confrontational, reminiscent of leftist ideologies, yet they demand free meals, state-provided security in the university’s vicinity, and immunity from responsibility or property damage when vacating occupied facilities. This raises questions about the type of leaders and future advocates these generations will produce.
Key Questions and Answers
- Why is there recent activism at UNAM? The activism stems from generational and sociodemographic shifts, with Millennials demanding more from the university than previous generations.
- What are students demanding? Students are requesting improved security, better food options, and continued scholarship support.
- How has the rector responded? The rector established a commission to review existing scholarships and work towards enhanced services in university dining facilities.
- What concerns do these demands raise? Concerns include the entitlement mentality, disregard for rules, and the expectation of instant gratification without contributing to the cause.
