CRT’s Controversial Mobile Registration Campaign Fuels User Concerns

Web Editor

January 27, 2026

a woman in a black jacket is smiling for the camera with her arms crossed and her hands folded in fr

Background on the Comisión Reguladora de Telecomunicaciones (CRT)

The Comisión Reguladora de Telecomunicaciones (CRT) is a Mexican regulatory body responsible for overseeing the telecommunications sector. Its role includes ensuring fair competition, protecting consumer rights, and promoting technological advancements in telecommunications.

The Controversial Campaign

In response to escalating criticism regarding the mobile line linking process, the CRT launched a public relations campaign. However, instead of alleviating user concerns, this campaign has only intensified worries and bolstered potential legal arguments users might employ in an amparo lawsuit against the registration.

The Misleading Infographic

On January 8, the CRT posted an infographic on social media platform “X” with the slogan “si no vinculas, no hablas” (if you don’t link, you can’t talk). This phrase is not only inaccurate but also potentially dangerous. It openly disregards constitutional rights to information technology access, telecommunications services, and the internet, as outlined in Article 6 of the Constitution. Moreover, it reveals that restricting internet access also violates other human rights dependent on it, such as access to information and freedom of expression.

User Concerns and Statistics

According to ENDUTIH, managed by INEGI, there were 98.6 million mobile phone users in Mexico in 2024. Of these, 96.6% used smartphones exclusively, and 77.9% of this group accessed social networks for content consumption or creation. Thus, mobile devices are a primary tool for Mexicans to engage in the “marketplace of ideas” and contribute their opinions to public debate.

The ill-advised phrase “si no vinculas, no hablas” projects a threatening tone rather than an informative one. It highlights the potential impact of mobile registration on users’ rights, given the backdrop of accusations against the government for censorship.

CRT’s Response and Further Concerns

On January 19, CRT Presiding Commissioner Norma Solano gave an interview to Juan Becerra of Fórmula Noticias, attempting to clarify data protection for registered line holders. Instead, she confirmed users’ primary concern: that the registration would be used to identify potential or suspected offenders in case of crimes involving registered chips.

Solano stated that all lines must be identified and linked to an individual, so authorities can identify perpetrators or suspects if a crime is committed using the registered chip. The genuine user concern, however, lies in authorities potentially using this data as presumption of guilt in case of crime.

Additional CRT Claims

The CRT also claims the registration will enhance mobile device care and reduce losses due to theft or misplacement. Furthermore, they plan a mass campaign to prevent purchasing fraudulent chips.

This stance implies that, given the inefficiency of authorities in curbing mobile phone theft, fraudulent chip sales, and extortion, the CRT intends to shift responsibility onto users for safeguarding their devices and avoiding fraud, lest they be branded as extortionists.

Call for Improved Communication Strategy

Given the controversial nature of this measure, it is crucial for the CRT to reassess its public communication strategy.

Key Questions and Answers

  • What is the CRT’s role? The Comisión Reguladora de Telecomunicaciones (CRT) is a Mexican regulatory body overseeing the telecommunications sector, ensuring fair competition, protecting consumer rights, and promoting technological advancements.
  • What sparked the controversy? The CRT’s campaign to mandate mobile registration has fueled user concerns about privacy, potential misuse of personal data, and the implications for freedom of expression.
  • What are users’ primary concerns? Users worry that their personal data could be used as presumption of guilt in case of crime, rather than for legitimate law enforcement purposes.
  • What does the CRT claim about the registration? The CRT argues that registration will improve mobile device security, reduce losses from theft or misplacement, and prevent fraudulent chip purchases.
  • Why is there a need for improved communication? Given the controversy and user concerns, the CRT should reevaluate its communication strategy to address these issues transparently and effectively.