Introduction to the Independent Expert Labor Board on Mexico (INMEP)
The Independent Expert Labor Board on Mexico (INMEP), established by the US implementation law of the USMCA, presented a mixed report on the progress of Mexico’s labor reform during the 2025 USMCA Labor Council Meeting.
About Ben Davis and the Steelworkers Union (USW)
Ben Davis, Director of International Affairs at the Steelworkers Union (USW) and a member of INMEP, led the presentation. He acknowledged positive aspects but emphasized that current mechanisms are insufficient to transform workers’ conditions.
INMEP’s Purpose and Key Findings
INMEP’s primary objective is to monitor and evaluate the implementation of Mexico’s labor reform and its compliance with labor obligations, advising the US government on developing capabilities to support this implementation and compliance.
- Positive Developments: The creation of labor centers and tribunals, increased minimum wage, and the utility of the Rapid Response Mechanism (RRM) have been noted.
- Case Examples: Cases like General Motors, Goodyear, and Yasaki have been or could be significant for labor relations.
Mixed Report and Criticisms
Despite these advancements, INMEP’s overall assessment is critical. After six cases taken to an arbitration panel, including the first victory for workers in the Atento case, Davis concluded that the tool has not met its transformative potential.
- Limited Impact: The RRM, though relatively quick, is insufficient in absolute terms, with only 1-2% of the mining and manufacturing workforce in Mexico covered by the MLRR since its inception.
New Corporate Unionism Concerns
A significant concern revolves around worker safety and the labor landscape. Davis expressed worry about the growth of traditional union groups with new affiliations.
- Growing Influence: Unions like CTM, FASIM, and CATEM are gaining influence and power, according to Davis’s personal view, carrying historical “charros” baggage.
He also criticized the RRM process’s slow pace, taking an average of a year for a decision, which is unacceptable for those facing retaliation.
INMEP Recommendations
A crucial recommendation aims to reverse the burden of proof in cases, proposing that companies should provide necessary information under their control rather than workers.
Lastly, the board urged official confirmation that the panel’s responsibility is to analyze cases from a pro-worker standpoint based on labor human rights.
