Ex-US Officials Urge Supreme Court to Prevent Removal of Fed’s Lisa Cook

Web Editor

September 25, 2025

a man with a white beard and a blue suit and tie is looking at the camera with a serious look on his

Background on Key Figures and Their Relevance

A group of 18 prominent former U.S. Treasury Secretaries, ex-Fed chairs, and other economic leaders has urged the Supreme Court to prevent President Donald Trump from removing Lisa Cook, a member of the Federal Reserve Board (Fed). These distinguished individuals include former Fed chairs Ben Bernanke and Alan Greenspan, as well as Janet Yellen (who served under President Joe Biden) and Henry Paulson (who served during George W. Bush’s administration).

Reasons for Opposing Removal

The ex-officials argue that removing Cook would expose the Federal Reserve to political influences, thereby undermining public trust in its independence and jeopardizing the credibility and effectiveness of U.S. monetary policy.

The Federal Reserve’s Independence

Congress designed the Fed as an independent entity, shielded from political pressures. Maintaining the status quo while determining the legality of Cook’s removal would serve the public interest by safeguarding the Fed’s independence and stability, according to these ex-officials.

Lisa Cook’s Response

In response, Lisa Cook has also urged the Supreme Court to reject Trump’s attempt to dismiss her, stating that such a move would destroy the Fed’s independence and disrupt financial markets.

Legal Arguments Against Removal

Cook’s legal team submitted a written opposition to Trump’s emergency request filed with the Department of Justice on September 18, which sought to lift a federal judge’s order preventing Trump from immediately dismissing Cook. The attorneys argued that granting Trump’s petition would drastically alter the status quo, disregard centuries of history, and transform the Federal Reserve into a subservient entity to the president’s will.

The Fed’s Unique Independence

Cook’s attorneys emphasized that the Federal Reserve’s unique history of independence has contributed significantly to making the U.S. economy one of the strongest in the world. Siding with Trump, they argued, would signal to financial markets that the Fed no longer enjoys its independence.

Key Questions and Answers

  • Who are the ex-officials urging the Supreme Court to prevent Lisa Cook’s removal? The group consists of 18 prominent former U.S. Treasury Secretaries, ex-Fed chairs, and other economic leaders, including Ben Bernanke, Alan Greenspan, Janet Yellen, and Henry Paulson.
  • Why are these officials concerned about Lisa Cook’s removal? They argue that removing Cook would expose the Federal Reserve to political influences, undermining public trust in its independence and jeopardizing the credibility and effectiveness of U.S. monetary policy.
  • What is Lisa Cook’s response to President Trump’s attempt to dismiss her? Cook has urged the Supreme Court to reject Trump’s attempt, stating that such a move would destroy the Fed’s independence and disrupt financial markets.
  • What are the legal arguments presented by Cook’s attorneys? They argue that granting Trump’s petition would drastically alter the status quo, disregard centuries of history, and transform the Federal Reserve into a subservient entity to the president’s will. Cook’s attorneys also emphasize that the Fed’s unique history of independence has contributed significantly to making the U.S. economy one of the strongest in the world.