Reform Proposal Threatens Autonomy of the Federal Center for Labor Mediation and Registration

Web Editor

October 19, 2025

a group of people standing in front of a building with cars parked in front of it and people walking

Background on the Federal Center for Labor Mediation and Registration (CFCRL)

The CFCRL, established under the 2019 labor reform, has been a crucial component in fulfilling commitments under the USMCA (United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement). It was designed as an independent, technical authority to mediate labor conflicts and ensure impartiality between unions, companies, and the government.

Senator Geovanna Bañuelos’ Reform Proposal

Senator Geovanna Bañuelos, representing the Party of the Democratic Center (PT), introduced a reform to the Federal Labor Law. This proposal aims to shift control of the CFCRL from an autonomous entity to a subordinate support organ under the Secretariat of Labor and Social Security (STPS).

Key Changes in the Proposed Reform

  • STPS Takes Charge: The STPS will now initiate, guide, and resolve procedures related to alleged violations of freedom of association and collective bargaining.
  • CFCRL’s Role Reduced: The CFCRL will only compile investigations and forward them to the STPS for resolution, effectively diminishing its autonomy.
  • Concentration of Sanctioning Power: The reform centralizes sanctioning functions within the STPS, giving the federal government direct control over labor disputes and recalling a previous model where the STPS mediated politically.

Experts’ Concerns and International Implications

Critics argue that this reform undermines the spirit of independence intended to ensure impartiality among unions, companies, and the government. Moreover, as the USMCA requires independent authorities to authenticate genuine labor freedom, this reform could invite international scrutiny.

Alfonso Bouzas’ Perspective

Alfonso Bouzas, coordinator of the Citizen Observatory for Labor Reform, stated that the reform aims to “strip the CFCRL of its autonomy, which is unconstitutional. The reform guarantees the CFCRL’s independence as a labor conflict resolution mechanism; however, the proposal turns it into an investigative office dependent on the STPS.”

Bouzas further commented that this reform represents a step backward in implementing the labor reform, as it bureaucratizes conflict resolution and exempts unions from responsibility for violating collective rights, effectively reverting to past practices under worse conditions.

Key Questions and Answers

  • What is the Federal Center for Labor Mediation and Registration (CFCRL)? The CFCRL is an independent, technical authority established under the 2019 labor reform to mediate labor conflicts and ensure impartiality between unions, companies, and the government.
  • What changes does Senator Geovanna Bañuelos’ reform proposal introduce? The proposed reform shifts control of the CFCRL from an autonomous entity to a subordinate support organ under the Secretariat of Labor and Social Security (STPS). It also centralizes sanctioning functions within the STPS, giving the federal government direct control over labor disputes.
  • Why are experts concerned about this reform? Critics argue that the reform undermines the spirit of independence intended to ensure impartiality among unions, companies, and the government. Additionally, as the USMCA requires independent authorities to authenticate genuine labor freedom, this reform could invite international scrutiny.