Israel Claims Killing Iranian Commander Amid Cross-Border Attacks: Iran Says It Won’t Negotiate Nuclear Program Under Threat

Web Editor

June 21, 2025

a group of airplanes flying over a city skyline with tall buildings in the background and a few jets

Background on Key Figures and Context

The recent escalation in cross-border attacks between Israel and Iran has resulted in significant developments, with both nations asserting their positions. At the heart of this conflict lies Iran’s nuclear program, which Israel claims poses an existential threat. Meanwhile, Iran insists its nuclear activities are peaceful.

Saeed Izadi, a veteran commander of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps’ Quds Force, was reportedly killed by Israel during these attacks. Izadi was sanctioned by both the United States and the United Kingdom for his alleged support of Palestinian militant group Hamas. His death marks a significant loss for Iran, as he played a crucial role in financing and arming various militant groups.

Abbas Araqchi, Iran’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, has stated that Israel’s aggression—with apparent U.S. involvement—must cease for Iran to return to diplomacy. Araqchi emphasized that negotiations with the U.S. cannot proceed while Iran faces attacks supported by the U.S.

Key Events and Developments

  • Israeli Claims: Israel reported killing Iranian commander Saeed Izadi during the cross-border attacks. The Israeli Defense Minister, Israel Katz, hailed it as a “great achievement” of Israeli intelligence and air force.
  • Iranian Response: Iran declared it would not negotiate its nuclear program while under threat. The Islamic Republic has accused Israel and the U.S. of carrying out attacks against its territory.
  • Casualties and Damage: At least 430 people have died and 3,500 have been injured in Iran since Israel’s attacks began on June 13. In Israel, 24 civilians have lost their lives due to Iranian missile attacks.
  • Nuclear Concerns: Israel asserts that Iran is on the verge of developing nuclear weapons, while Iran maintains its nuclear program serves only peaceful purposes.
  • Attacks on Nuclear Sites: Israel claims to have targeted Iran’s storage facilities and missile launch infrastructure. Iranian news agency Fars reported an attack on the Isfahan nuclear facility, though no hazardous material leaks were reported.
  • Iranian Retaliation: The Iranian military has reported no fatalities from Israeli attacks, but the Human Rights Activists News Agency (US-based) reported 639 deaths in Iran due to these attacks.
  • High-Ranking Iranian Official’s Statement: A high-ranking Iranian official told Reuters that Tehran is open to discussing limitations on uranium enrichment but would reject any proposal restricting its full enrichment capacity, “especially now under Israeli attacks.”

Key Questions and Answers

  1. Q: Who is Saeed Izadi, and why is his death significant?
  2. A: Saeed Izadi was a veteran commander of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps’ Quds Force, responsible for financing and arming militant groups like Hamas. His death is significant due to his crucial role in supporting these groups and the loss of a high-ranking Iranian official.

  3. Q: What is the nature of the conflict between Israel and Iran?
  4. A: The conflict centers around Israel’s claim that Iran is developing nuclear weapons, which it considers an existential threat. Iran maintains its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes only.

  5. Q: How has each side responded to the attacks?
  6. A: Israel has continued its attacks on Iran’s storage facilities and missile launch infrastructure, while Iran has declared it will not negotiate its nuclear program under threat. Both sides have reported casualties and damage.

  7. Q: What are Iran’s conditions for returning to diplomacy?
  8. A: Iran’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Abbas Araqchi, has stated that Israel’s aggression—with apparent U.S. involvement—must cease for Iran to return to diplomacy.

  9. Q: What is the status of Iran’s nuclear program?
  10. A: Israel asserts that Iran is near developing nuclear weapons, while Iran insists its program serves only peaceful purposes. Iran has expressed willingness to discuss limitations on uranium enrichment but rejects any proposal restricting its full enrichment capacity.