Judge William Alsup Rules Trump Administration’s Mass Firings Unlawful

Web Editor

September 13, 2025

a close up of a person wearing a suit and tie smiling at the camera with a fireplace in the backgrou

Background on the Case

In a recent ruling, U.S. District Judge William Alsup in San Francisco determined that the Trump administration had illegally ordered the mass firing of thousands of federal employees. However, he did not mandate their reinstatement, citing recent decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Parties Involved

Unions, non-profit organizations, and the state of Washington filed a lawsuit after the Trump administration took steps to dismiss approximately 25,000 probationary employees. These workers typically have less than a year of service, although some are long-term employees in new positions.

Judge Alsup’s Decision

Judge Alsup stated that under normal circumstances, he would have disregarded the unlawful OPM directive and nullified its consequences, returning the parties to their previous state. However, he acknowledged that the Supreme Court had made it clear through its recent caseload that it would overturn judicially granted protections regarding hiring and firing within the executive branch, not just in this case but in others as well.

Supreme Court’s Involvement

In April, the Supreme Court suspended a preliminary injunction issued by Alsup, which required six agencies to reinstate 17,000 employees while the litigation progressed.

Alsup noted that significant changes had occurred since the Supreme Court’s April decision, making it inappropriate to order employee reinstatement now. Many had secured new positions while the administration restructured the federal government.

Judge Alsup’s Order

Despite this, Alsup, appointed by Democratic President Bill Clinton, acknowledged that workers “continue to suffer from the pretextual termination by OPM ‘for cause,'” and that this harm could be rectified without reinstatement.

Alsup ordered 19 agencies, including Defense, Veterans Affairs, Agriculture, Energy, Interior, and Treasury departments, to update employee files by November 14 and prohibited them from following OPM guidelines for worker dismissals.

Next Steps

Representatives for both the plaintiffs and the White House did not respond to requests for comment on Saturday.

Key Questions and Answers

  • What is the main issue in this case? The central concern is whether the Trump administration’s mass firings of federal employees were lawful.
  • Who are the parties involved in the lawsuit? Unions, non-profit organizations, and the state of Washington are the plaintiffs.
  • What did Judge Alsup decide? Judge Alsup ruled that the mass firings were unlawful but did not order the employees’ reinstatement, citing recent Supreme Court decisions.
  • What actions did Judge Alsup order? He ordered 19 federal agencies to update employee files and prohibited them from following OPM guidelines for dismissals.
  • What was the Supreme Court’s role in this case? The Supreme Court suspended a preliminary injunction issued by Judge Alsup, requiring six agencies to reinstate 17,000 employees.