US Supreme Court Grants DOGE Access to Social Security Data: Ketanji Brown Jackson Warns of Privacy Risks

Web Editor

June 6, 2025

a flag flying on top of a building with a flagpole on top of it and a statue of a man on top of the

Background on DOGE and its Mandate

The Committee for Efficiency in Government (DOGE) was established by former President Donald Trump to identify and cut unnecessary public spending. Recently, this committee has been led by Elon Musk, the founder of SpaceX and Tesla, whose relationship with Trump has become strained.

Supreme Court Ruling and Disagreement

The US Supreme Court granted DOGE access to millions of Americans’ Social Security records, overturning a district court’s April order that restricted DOGE’s access to such data.

In a unsigned decision, the Supreme Court stated that the Social Security Administration (SSA) “may grant DOGE team members access to relevant agency records so they can perform their work.”

Three liberal female justices—including Ketanji Brown Jackson—dissented from the majority opinion.

Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Concerns

Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson expressed serious concerns about the privacy risks associated with this decision, stating that it poses “significant risks to the privacy of millions of Americans.”

“Sensitive information such as Social Security numbers, birthdates, addresses, bank account numbers, medical histories, and more are at stake,” Jackson explained.

“The government seeks to provide DOGE unrestricted access to this personal and non-anonymous information immediately, without allowing courts time to assess the legality of such access,” she added.

District Court Judge Ellen Hollander’s Decision

In her April ruling, District Court Judge Ellen Hollander prohibited DOGE personnel from accessing personally identifiable data, including Social Security numbers, medical histories, or bank records.

Judge Hollander asserted that the Social Security Administration could only supply redacted or anonymous records to DOGE employees who had undergone background checks and privacy training on federal laws, regulations, and policies.

Importance of Social Security Numbers in the US

Social Security numbers are crucial identifiers in the United States, used for income reporting and determining eligibility for social security benefits and retirement programs.

Trump’s Ongoing Conflict with the Judiciary

Since returning to the White House in January, Trump has consistently clashed with the judiciary when judges contradict his policies.

Key Questions and Answers

  • What is DOGE? The Committee for Efficiency in Government (DOGE) was established by former President Donald Trump to identify and reduce unnecessary public spending.
  • What did the Supreme Court rule? The US Supreme Court granted DOGE access to millions of Americans’ Social Security records, overturning a district court’s order that restricted DOGE’s access to such data.
  • Who dissented from the ruling? Three liberal female justices, including Ketanji Brown Jackson, dissented from the majority opinion.
  • What are Ketanji Brown Jackson’s concerns? Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson expressed serious privacy risks associated with granting DOGE unrestricted access to sensitive personal information.
  • What restrictions did District Court Judge Ellen Hollander impose? Judge Hollander prohibited DOGE personnel from accessing personally identifiable data, including Social Security numbers, medical histories, or bank records.
  • Why are Social Security numbers important in the US? Social Security numbers serve as crucial identifiers in the United States, used for income reporting and determining eligibility for social security benefits and retirement programs.
  • How has Trump’s relationship with the judiciary been? Since returning to the White House in January, Trump has consistently clashed with the judiciary when judges contradict his policies.