100 Days of Fear: An Analysis of Trump’s Policies and Global Impact

Web Editor

April 29, 2025

a blue book cover with a picture of a man in glasses and a black background with a blue circle, Agus

Introduction

In the first 100 days of his presidency, Donald Trump has initiated multiple “wars,” targeting public federal administration and soft power, primarily through the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). These actions have left a significant impact on both domestic and international affairs.

Trump’s Domestic Policies

Trump has launched a war against the public federal administration, which includes initiatives spearheaded by Elon Musk. The ultimate goal is to redirect financial resources towards federal coffers, aiming to reduce taxes. Simultaneously, Trump has declared war on the soft power of his country, managed by USAID. The legacy of Samantha Power’s tenure has been shattered, with more than 80% of projects canceled.

Migration as the Vector of Fear

Trump’s strategy focuses on migration, employing El Tren de Aragua to mediate his approach. This tactic aims to instill fear and manipulate public opinion regarding immigration.

Trump’s Foreign Policy

Trump’s foreign policy has been marked by tensions with the U.S. Department of State officials, as Washington pivots geopolitically. Allies are no longer reliable, and former adversaries have gained favor.

Trump’s Approach to Global Issues

Trump has prioritized combating terrorism, labeling certain countries as threats. His mediation in the Ukraine conflict has yielded no positive results, as his imposed conditions were rejected by both Ukraine and Russia. Trump envisions himself as a wise, powerful leader who will secure the Nobel Peace Prize through a photo of Zelenski and Putin shaking hands.

Relegation of International Organizations

Washington has sidelined Brussels, diminishing the influence of both the European Union and NATO. Two crucial pieces have been removed from the global chessboard, as Trump seeks uncontested leadership.

Impact on Specific Regions

The Gaza Strip remains a living hell for Palestinians and a source of confusion for European leaders. Images of Netanyahu and Trump enjoying margaritas on the Gaza coastline highlight the unsettling connections between Trump’s policies and questionable figures.

Multilateral Organizations’ Responses

The response from multilateral organizations to Trump’s policies has been muted, raising concerns about the normalization of genocide and the potential for global authoritarianism.

Relevance of Individuals and Nations

The case of Kilmar Ábrego García, a Salvadoran citizen detained for taking selfies with prisoners intended for Amnesty International and the UN, underscores the disregard for human rights under Trump’s administration.

Canada-U.S. Relations

Mark Carney, a Canadian politician, has accurately described the changing dynamics between Canada and the U.S., emphasizing that relations will no longer resemble those of just 101 days prior.

Mexico’s Diplomatic Challenges

Mexico has struggled to optimize its diplomacy due to a lack of expertise and professionals. The relationship with Washington has become increasingly treacherous, with no clear path forward.

Trump’s Global Influence

Despite criticism, Trump’s unwavering determination and anger resonate with a global society dissatisfied with the status quo. This dynamic may signal the resurgence of global authoritarianism.

Key Questions and Answers

  • What are the main domestic policies initiated by Trump in his first 100 days? Trump has targeted public federal administration and soft power, aiming to reduce taxes and undermine USAID initiatives.
  • How has Trump’s foreign policy affected global relations? Tensions with traditional allies, favoritism towards former adversaries, and a diminished role for international organizations have reshaped global dynamics.
  • What impact has Trump’s approach had on specific regions? The Gaza Strip remains a source of suffering and confusion, while images of Trump’s allies enjoying themselves on the Gaza coastline highlight questionable connections.
  • How have multilateral organizations responded to Trump’s policies? Their responses have been muted, raising concerns about the normalization of genocide and global authoritarianism.
  • What do the cases of Kilmar Ábrego García and Mark Carney’s analysis tell us about Trump’s administration? These instances demonstrate disregard for human rights and the changing nature of Canada-U.S. relations, respectively.
  • What challenges does Mexico face in its diplomatic efforts? Mexico struggles with a lack of expertise and professionals, leading to treacherous relations with Washington.
  • What does Trump’s unwavering determination suggest about his global influence? His persistence and anger resonate with a dissatisfied global society, potentially signaling the resurgence of global authoritarianism.