Housing Program Advances in Mexico, Despite Trump’s Trade Policies

Web Editor

July 16, 2025

a man with a beard and glasses standing in front of a blue background with the words, el pasonista,

Introduction to the Housing Program by President Claudia Sheinbaum

A house is more than just walls and a roof; it’s a personal space where families can live, grow, and hopefully find peace and affection. This is especially significant in Mexico, where the majority of people have historically lacked decent housing. This is why President Claudia Sheinbaum’s housing program should be taken seriously.

Program Updates and Progress

During the recent morning press conference, updates were shared about the Vivienda para el Bienestar program. The initial target of constructing 1.1 million homes during the six-year term has been expanded to 1.2 million. Additionally, 1.55 million home improvement support and 1 million property deeds will be issued. As of now, there are 138,473 homes under construction or in preliminary stages, representing 75% of this year’s target. In 30 states, construction projects have already begun.

These homes are at least 60 square meters, featuring a living room, dining area, two bedrooms, kitchen, and bathroom. They are not luxurious mansions but a significant improvement from the 30 square meter “eggs” that were once built in peripheral suburbs of cities.

Program Objectives and Features

The program includes rent-to-own schemes and caters to both rightful claimants and those who have never had access to credit. The aim is not just to deliver homes but to build communities. In places like Ciudad Victoria, homes will start being handed over in August with more careful urban design, donated lands from state governments, and guaranteed basic services.

Moreover, 254 plots have been identified across the country for future developments, with integrated territorial reserves and ongoing urban projects ensuring connectivity, transportation, and access to essential services.

Challenges Ahead

However, the program faces risks. Trump’s tariff impositions are slowing down Mexico’s economic growth, reducing fiscal income and increasing unemployment. If the GDP continues to contract and hundreds of thousands more lose their jobs or see income reductions, the program’s financial viability will be questioned. Less revenue means fewer resources for construction, and more unemployment implies less capacity to pay rents or credit.

Critics of the program include architects, urban planners, and real estate developers who warn about the lack of public design competitions, excessive centralization of decisions, and the risk of implementing rigid models without regional adaptation or genuine community participation. The creation of a construction company within the Infonavit has caused tension with the private sector, fearing displacement.

Additionally, there’s uncertainty about ensuring maintenance, security, and social integration of the homes and residential complexes.

The Correct Premise

Despite these challenges, the program is based on a correct premise: housing as a right and a foundation for a dignified life. If the government can adjust to external pressures, correct shortcomings, and incorporate social and technical capabilities, the project can leave a profound impact.

Ultimately, it’s not just about building houses; it’s about providing homes.

Key Questions and Answers

  • What is the main focus of President Claudia Sheinbaum’s housing program? The program aims to provide dignified housing for the majority of Mexicans who have historically lacked decent living conditions.
  • What are the program’s progress and objectives? The program has constructed or initiated 138,473 homes out of a target of 1.2 million for the six-year term. It also plans to issue 1.55 million home improvement supports and 1 million property deeds, focusing on building communities with careful urban design and guaranteed basic services.
  • What challenges does the housing program face? The program faces risks due to Trump’s tariffs, which are slowing down Mexico’s economic growth and reducing fiscal income. Critics also point out concerns about decision-making centralization, lack of public design competitions, and uncertainty regarding maintenance, security, and social integration.
  • What is the significance of this housing program? The program’s success would provide dignified homes, not just houses, and contribute to building communities with better living conditions.