Should Electoral Rules Be Changed After Allowing Opposition Access to Power?

Web Editor

August 6, 2025

a typewriter with a face drawn on it and a caption for the words opinion and a question, Edward Otho

Historical Context of Mexico’s Electoral Reforms

For over 70 years, Mexico experienced a one-party dominant regime through the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI). However, in 1963, an electoral reform was promoted to open space for political party representation. This led to the introduction of “party deputies,” allowing some leaders who did not win electoral districts to enter the Chamber of Deputies if their national political party secured at least 2.5% of the total votes.

Evolution of Electoral Reforms

  • 1963: The 2.5% threshold for party deputies was established, enabling minoritarian social segments to gain political representation despite the hegemonic party’s control over public resources and security forces.
  • 1972: The threshold was reduced to 1.5% for party deputies, but access remained challenging for the opposition.
  • 1977: A new electoral reform introduced a mixed system, with 300 deputies elected by majority and up to 100 through proportional representation via regional lists. This system was mandatory for federal entities, ensuring both national and regional proportional representation.
  • 1986: The number of proportional representation deputies was increased to 200, while maintaining 300 majority deputies. The limit for a political party to obtain deputies through both principles was set at 350.
  • 1990-1994: Reforms expanded plural representation in the Senate, created an autonomous electoral body, and established a Federal Electoral Tribunal with a legal system for appeals.

Current Debate on Electoral Reform

Currently, discussions are underway for another electoral reform, targeting proportional representation deputies and partisan prerogatives. Critics argue these changes would undermine plural representation, which aligns with the evolving social reality.

The existing electoral system is not a recent creation but the result of decades of democratic opposition efforts to open political participation for all parties.

Some electoral reforms should not be subject to the majority’s criteria, as they risk extinguishing minority participation—an antidemocratic and unconstitutional act.

Key Questions and Answers

  • Q: What were the historical electoral reforms in Mexico? A: Over the years, Mexico implemented several electoral reforms. Notable changes include introducing party deputies in 1963, reducing the threshold to 1.5% in 1972, establishing a mixed electoral system in 1977, and increasing proportional representation deputies to 200 in 1986. The 1990-1994 period saw further reforms expanding plural representation in the Senate and establishing autonomous electoral bodies.
  • Q: Why is the current electoral system significant? A: The existing electoral system is crucial as it represents the culmination of democratic opposition’s efforts to ensure political participation for all parties over several decades.
  • Q: What are the concerns regarding proposed electoral reforms? A: Critics argue that proposed changes, such as altering proportional representation deputies and partisan prerogatives, could hinder plural representation, which is essential to reflect the evolving social reality.
  • Q: Are all electoral reforms subject to majority approval? A: No, some electoral reforms should not be subject to the majority’s criteria, as they risk extinguishing minority participation—an antidemocratic and unconstitutional act.