The Brutality of Militarized ICE Agents and the Crisis of Republic 2026

Web Editor

January 26, 2026

a woman with white hair and a scarf around her neck is standing in front of a blue background with a

Introduction

The brutality of militarized Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents against the American population, under the pretext of detaining undocumented immigrants with criminal records, has already claimed nine lives in a year. This month, Renée Good and Alex Pretti, white American citizens acting as observers, were executed in broad daylight and subsequently labeled as “domestic terrorists” by the government and dishonest media, while their perpetrators remain unpunished. Good and Pretti were part of a peaceful protest movement alongside tens of thousands others, opposing the cruelty policy instigated in the U.S. by a regime that tramples all legal and ethical boundaries.

The Impact of Militarized ICE Agents

These militarized ICE agents’ actions have resulted in the deaths of nine individuals within a year. Renée Good and Alex Pretti, white American citizens who served as observers, were fatally shot in public and then smeared as “domestic terrorists” by the government and dishonest media, while their assailants remain unaccountable. Good and Pretti were part of a larger peaceful protest movement against the cruelty policy instigated in the U.S. by a regime that disregards all legal and ethical limits.

Protesters and civil organizations defend the rights of individuals, human rights to not be arbitrarily detained and violated, as well as the right to freedom of expression and assembly; they defend the Republic.

Historical Context: Arendt’s Crisis of the Republic

Though more stark, the government’s disregard for both national and international law that has sparked global outrage and massive protests in the U.S. mirrors the situation that inspired Arendt’s reflections in “Crisis of the Republic,” where she defends civil disobedience and elucidates her insightful distinction between violence and power.

“On Civil Disobedience” explains that civil disobedience occurs when “a significant group of citizens” unites to achieve legal changes—unattainable through other means—or opposes governmental actions whose legitimacy and constitutionality are in question, such as the unauthorized invasion of Cambodia or attacks on freedom of expression and “the ominous reference by the Vice President to dissidents as ‘vultures and parasites’ to be discarded like bad apples.” Today, one could mention intervention in Venezuela, repression of protesters, and criminalization of dissent and otherness by the government.

Contemporary Resistance and Civil Disobedience

Though the current resistance has not directly employed civil disobedience, which involves breaking the law, it shares similar goals and methods. It is a peaceful movement to preserve the Constitution, states’ rights, and civil liberties. The significance of this movement, like civil disobedience, lies in uniting people with shared viewpoints, forming substantial minorities expressing the same opinion and employing peaceful means to dissent.

Labeling these minorities as “rebels” or “traitors” (or “terrorists”) contradicts the Constitution’s spirit and truth, Arendt asserts. The value of civil disobedience extends beyond seeking positive changes through peaceful means; it is a form of collective action that asserts citizen participation in public affairs amidst the crisis of representation through government, political parties, and institutions.

Arendt considers it a new form of “voluntary association,” highly valued by Alexis de Tocqueville, acting as a remedy against institutional failures and fostering trust in others while confronting the “uncertainty of the future.”

The Importance of Collective Action and Nonviolence

As citizens confront a regime seemingly intent on provoking violent reactions to establish an exception state under the Insurrection Act, it’s crucial to highlight the value of collective action and nonviolence as expressions of a citizenry’s restraint and courage that rejects the rule of force.

This collective action capacity, according to Arendt, constitutes power—the ability to create something new and improve the world. In contrast, domination and violence can only destroy and worsen the world.

Those attempting to rule through terror are destined for failure: after attacking their “enemies,” state-police/totalitarian regimes eventually consume those who create and support them. Consequently, “power also disappears.”

Key Questions and Answers

  • What is the main issue discussed in this article? The brutality of militarized ICE agents and its impact on American citizens, drawing parallels to historical contexts of civil disobedience.
  • Who are Renée Good and Alex Pretti? White American citizens who were fatally shot while acting as observers during a peaceful protest against ICE’s cruelty policy.
  • What is civil disobedience, according to Hannah Arendt? A form of peaceful collective action that challenges unjust laws or governmental actions when other means have failed, asserting citizen participation in public affairs.
  • Why is collective action and nonviolence important in the current context? These methods represent restraint, courage, and a rejection of the rule of force, creating opportunities for positive change and fostering trust in others.
  • What is the ultimate outcome for regimes that rule through terror? Such regimes ultimately consume those who support them, leading to the disappearance of power.