Understanding the Difference Between Authoritarianism and Freedom: Why America Doesn’t Want a King

Web Editor

October 20, 2025

a man in a suit and tie standing with his arms crossed in front of him with a blue background, Estua

Introduction

Since its founding, the United States has been a nation built on the principles of individual freedom, self-governance, and rejection of absolute power. The phrase, “The United States does not want a king,” is not just a historical statement; it’s a fundamental principle that shapes the country’s political and cultural identity.

Historical Context

The American Revolution was essentially a rebellion against authoritarianism. The founders rejected the monarchy of King George III and established a republic where power emanates from the people. The slogan “No King but a Law” became a symbol of resistance and commitment to freedom since the American War of Independence began in 1765.

These principles remain relevant today, much to the dismay of those aspiring to be America’s king.

Understanding Authoritarianism

Authoritarianism is characterized by the excessive concentration of power in one person or group. It stands in stark contrast to the democratic values that have shaped the United States.

  • Lack of Citizen Participation: In the U.S., citizen involvement in government decisions is not just desirable but essential.
  • Restriction of Civil Liberties: Limiting freedoms such as speech, press, and assembly directly contradicts the liberty principles on which the U.S. was founded.
  • Government by Decree: Without institutional checks, it’s a relic of past monarchies.
  • The King Concept: Traditional kings embody the concentration of power described above, and there’s no divine right or popular will to appoint such a figure in the U.S.

President Trump, despite his claims, exhibits these authoritarian traits. His disconnect from the American understanding of such behavior is alarming.

The American System

The U.S. system is designed to prevent the emergence of a “modern king”—an individual with absolute state power, unaccountable to anyone.

  • Representative Democracy: Citizens elect their leaders.
  • Separation of Powers: The Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches maintain distinct roles.
  • Constitutionally Protected Rights: Freedom of speech, religion, and press are cornerstones.
  • Limited Government: Power is always subject to citizen oversight through laws.

This framework ensures that no single person wields unchecked authority, a concept foreign to the American ethos.

Current Situation

Despite President Trump’s assertions, his power is not absolute. The ongoing protests against “No Kings” reflect this understanding.

  • The president lacks a supermajority in Congress, as demonstrated by the partial government shutdown.
  • His allies, like Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene and media outlets Fox News and Newsmax, have distanced themselves from his authoritarian tendencies.
  • Even the Supreme Court, often seen as a Trump ally, has declined to hear cases favorable to him.

The protests aren’t about immediate change but are a powerful expression of the popular will in a representative democracy. They serve as a reminder that each passing moment brings the nation closer to the next election.

Key Questions and Answers

  • Q: Why does the U.S. not want a king? A: The U.S. was founded on principles of individual freedom, self-governance, and rejection of absolute power.
  • Q: What are the characteristics of authoritarianism? A: Authoritarianism involves excessive concentration of power, lack of citizen participation, restriction of civil liberties, government by decree, and the concept of a king.
  • Q: How does the American system prevent a ‘modern king’? A: Through representative democracy, separation of powers, constitutionally protected rights, and limited government subject to citizen oversight.
  • Q: What limits President Trump’s power? A: Lack of supermajority in Congress, distancing of allies, Supreme Court’s decisions, and ongoing protests reflecting the popular will.