Claudia Sheinbaum Urges OAS to Refrain from Commenting on Mexico’s Judicial Selection Method

Web Editor

June 7, 2025

a woman holding a microphone up to her face and making a peace sign with her hands while standing in

Background on Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo

Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo is the current Head of Government (equivalent to Mayor) of Mexico City and a prominent figure in Mexican politics. As a scientist and activist before entering politics, she has been instrumental in shaping Mexico City’s policies on environmental sustainability, public transportation, and social programs. Her recent role as Head of Government has further solidified her influence in Mexico’s political landscape.

OAS’s Involvement and Sheinbaum’s Response

The Organization of American States (OAS) sent observers to monitor the recent judicial elections in Mexico. Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo, during a visit to the state of Morelos, addressed the OAS regarding their comments on Mexico’s judicial selection method. She emphasized that the OAS does not have the authority to comment on or recommend changes to Mexico’s judicial selection process.

Sheinbaum’s Key Points

  • Respect for Sovereignty: Sheinbaum stressed that Mexico has made a sovereign decision on its judicial system, and the OAS should respect this autonomy.
  • People’s Choice: She highlighted that the people of Mexico have chosen their method for selecting judges, magistrates, and court members, and the OAS should not interfere with this decision.
  • Constitutional Mandate: Sheinbaum reiterated that, according to the Mexican Constitution, the people are the ultimate authority in the country.

SRE’s Stance on OAS Recommendations

Prior to Sheinbaum’s response, the Mexican Secretariat of Foreign Affairs (SRE) also rejected certain recommendations provided by the OAS in their preliminary report on the judicial elections held on June 1. The SRE stated that the OAS mission exceeded its mandate and acted against the organization’s principles.

Content of OAS Recommendations

The OAS preliminary report, a 37-page document, acknowledged the complexity and polarization of the electoral process. The mission recommended several areas for improvement, including strengthening all stages of the process and addressing current deficiencies. However, it explicitly stated that the model should not be replicated by other countries in the region.

Key Questions and Answers

  • Q: What is the main issue at hand? The primary concern is whether the OAS should comment on or recommend changes to Mexico’s judicial selection process, which Mexican authorities consider a sovereign decision.
  • Q: Who is Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo? Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo is the Head of Government of Mexico City, a prominent figure in Mexican politics with a background in science and activism.
  • Q: What did the OAS preliminary report say about the judicial elections? The OAS report acknowledged the complexity and polarization of the electoral process while recommending areas for improvement. However, it did not suggest replicating Mexico’s judicial selection model in other countries.
  • Q: How did the SRE respond to OAS recommendations? The SRE rejected certain OAS recommendations, stating that the mission exceeded its mandate and acted against the organization’s principles.