Four Navy Officers Dismissed Over Fuel Smuggling Scandal

Web Editor

January 23, 2026

a man in a military uniform giving a speech at a podium with a microphone in front of him and a flag

Background and Relevance of the Individuals Involved

The Mexican Navy (Semar) has confirmed the administrative dismissal of high-ranking navy officers, Manuel Roberto Farías Laguna and his brother Fernando Farías Laguna, amidst investigations into fuel smuggling, also known as “huachicol,” by the Federal Attorney General’s Office (FGR).

Who are the Farías Brothers?

The Farías brothers, Manuel Roberto and Fernando, are accused of leading a fuel smuggling ring uncovered last year. Manuel Roberto, Raymundo Ojeda’s political nephew and the son of a former Navy secretary during Andrés Manuel López Obrador’s administration, is alleged to have placed affiliated individuals in customs to facilitate tax-free fuel shipments. Meanwhile, Fernando reportedly managed the financial aspects of this corrupt network.

The estimated financial impact on public coffers is 3,000 million pesos due to at least 31 fuel-carrying vessels being prevented from docking in Altamira and Tampico ports, classified as “oils.”

Navy’s Actions and Legal Developments

During the federal government’s morning press conference, Navy Secretary Raymundo Pedro Morales Ángeles explained that according to current legislation, if an individual cannot fulfill their obligations, they must be dismissed. He confirmed that four individuals linked to these accusations are currently detained, with 15 days to file review petitions in their legal proceedings.

A federal judge ordered the FGR to hand over the complete investigation file in Case 325/2025 against Vice Admiral Manuel Roberto Farías Laguna, comprising 20 volumes, during a rights safeguard hearing. This ruling halted the FGR’s opaque practices after the defense team reported receiving incomplete information, certified documents, and being denied access to the original file.

The judge ruled that the FGR cannot unilaterally decide which information to share and which to withhold. Consequently, she ordered the complete delivery of all 20 volumes; allowed certification only for copies while demanding the original file be available to the defense without certification; and established that any reservation must be justified in a private, court-supervised audience.

The judge set Tuesday, January 27, at 10:00 AM for the Fiscal Specialized in Organized Crime to comply with the order and comment on analysts whose interviews were requested by the defense.

Legal Defense and Future Steps

The Epigmenio Mendieta & Associates law firm, representing Vice Admiral Farías Laguna, praised the ruling as a crucial step to ensure a full, informed, and effective defense. They emphasized their commitment to pursuing legal avenues to secure respect for the principles of legality, transparency, and judicial oversight.

The law firm also clarified that preventive detention does not equate to a conviction or automatic loss of labor rights, and that the presumption of innocence remains until a firm sentence is issued.

Key Questions and Answers

  • Who are the Farías brothers? Manuel Roberto and Fernando Farías Laguna, high-ranking navy officers accused of leading a fuel smuggling ring.
  • What are they accused of? Manuel Roberto allegedly placed affiliated individuals in customs to facilitate tax-free fuel shipments, while Fernando managed the financial aspects of this corrupt network.
  • What is the estimated financial impact? The scandal is estimated to cost public coffers 3,000 million pesos due to at least 31 fuel-carrying vessels being prevented from docking in Altamira and Tampico ports.
  • What legal actions have been taken? The Navy dismissed Manuel Roberto on December 18 and Fernando on September 11. A federal judge ordered the FGR to hand over the complete investigation file, ruling against their opaque practices.
  • What is the legal defense’s stance? The Epigmenio Mendieta & Associates law firm emphasized the importance of the judge’s ruling for a full and informed defense, committing to further legal actions to uphold the principles of legality, transparency, and judicial oversight.