Latin American Organizations Warn of Impacts from “Anonymous Judges”

Web Editor

February 3, 2026

a group of people sitting at a table with their hands up in the air in front of them and a banner be

Background and Relevance

The Miguel Agustín Pro Human Rights Center (ProDH) has resumed testimonies and documented experiences from various Latin American countries where the concept of “anonymous judges” has been implemented. This practice was justified as a means to safeguard the lives and integrity of judges and prosecutors amidst violence or organized crime.

These countries include Peru, Colombia, Brazil, and El Salvador. The organizations and experts involved in this initiative are crucial as they highlight the severe consequences of anonymous judicial proceedings on due process and human rights protection.

Testimonies and Experiences

According to the collected voices, the judicial anonymity has consistently led to the erosion of fundamental guarantees such as impartiality, independent judiciary, and the right to a proper defense.

Legislative Discussions in the Senate

Presidential Reform Proposals

The president’s initiative to reform the National Criminal Procedures Code and the Federal Anti-Crime Law, which establishes security protection for judges (creation of the “anonymous judges” figure) and sets guidelines to combat crimes committed in flagrante, will be analyzed in the Senate through an open-door parliamentary scheme. This was announced by Javier Corral Jurado.

“We aim to add more precision to the president’s proposal. Although this figure is necessary, without proper regulation, it could pose a risk to human rights,” stated the president of the Senate’s Justice Commission.

He further anticipated that a regulatory framework will be established, making the “anonymous judges” figure “temporary yet exceptional with clear rules.”

Key Questions and Answers

  • What is the main concern of Latin American organizations regarding anonymous judges? These groups are worried that the anonymity of judges undermines essential legal principles like impartiality, independence, and the right to a fair defense.
  • Why is there a need for regulation of anonymous judges? Although this practice aims to protect judges in dangerous situations, without proper regulation, it could potentially harm human rights and due process.
  • What is the legislative process for addressing anonymous judges in Latin America? The Senate is currently reviewing proposed reforms to the National Criminal Procedures Code and Federal Anti-Crime Law, which include guidelines for anonymous judges.
  • What are the intended outcomes of these legislative discussions? The goal is to establish a clear, temporary, and exceptional regulatory framework for anonymous judges that ensures human rights protection and upholds the principles of due process.