SCJN to Review Contested TEPJF Magistrate Elections: Poder Ciudadano Welcomes Judicial Scrutiny

Web Editor

July 16, 2025

a large room with a wooden table and two people sitting at it with flags on the walls and a ceiling,

Background on Poder Ciudadano and its Relevance

Poder Ciudadano is a prominent Mexican civil organization dedicated to monitoring and ensuring transparency in electoral processes. Their commitment to upholding democratic principles and defending citizens’ rights has made them a key player in Mexico’s political landscape. Their recent involvement in challenging the election of two TEPJF magistrates highlights their ongoing efforts to promote judicial integrity and accountability.

The Contested Election of TEPJF Magistrates

Poder Ciudadano has raised concerns over the election process of two magistrates in the Tribunal Electoral del Poder Judicial de la Federación (TEPJF). The civil organization alleges that the election was “tainted from the outset and manipulated through partisan structures,” contradicting the principles of impartiality and judicial independence that should govern electoral justice.

SCJN’s Decision to Admit the Case

The Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN) has decided to admit a constitutional electoral complaint against the election of these two TEPJF magistrates. This decision is considered a “historical precedent” by Poder Ciudadano, as it opens the door to constitutional scrutiny of a judicial process that has previously remained unexamined.

Key Dates and Legal Context

Gabriela Sterling, President of Poder Ciudadano, filed the complaint. The SCJN has until August 28 to resolve this resource, adhering to the established legal timelines.

The complaint also questions the national aggregation of election results and the validity declaration of the contested judicial elections. However, the legitimacy of the case might face a legal hurdle since only participating candidates are legally authorized to file such resources under the Ley General del Sistema de Medios de Impugnación en Materia Electoral.

Additional Pending Case

Another case remains unresolved, initiated by Iván Bravo Olivas, who contested the results of the district-by-district tally in the National Electoral Institute. This case (1/2025) has been assigned to Minister Jorge Mario Pardo Rebolledo.

Key Questions and Answers

  • What is Poder Ciudadano’s role in this situation? Poder Ciudadano is a civil organization that monitors electoral processes and ensures transparency. In this case, they are challenging the election of two TEPJF magistrates due to alleged partisan manipulation and a lack of impartiality.
  • Why is the SCJN’s decision significant? The SCJN’s acceptance of the constitutional electoral complaint is a historical precedent, as it allows for constitutional scrutiny of a judicial process that has traditionally remained unexamined.
  • What are the key concerns raised by Poder Ciudadano? Poder Ciudadano alleges that the election process was “tainted from the outset” and manipulated through partisan structures, contradicting principles of impartiality and judicial independence.
  • What are the potential legal challenges? The legitimacy of the case might face a hurdle since only participating candidates are legally authorized to file such resources under the Ley General del Sistema de Medios de Impugnación en Materia Electoral.
  • What other cases are pending before the SCJN? Besides the case concerning the TEPJF magistrates, another case initiated by Iván Bravo Olivas contests the results of a district-by-district tally in the National Electoral Institute. This case (1/2025) is currently under Minister Jorge Mario Pardo Rebolledo’s consideration.