TEPJF Upholds Zacatecas Magistrates’ Election; Dismisses Late-Filed Challenges in San Luis Potosí

Web Editor

September 15, 2025

a group of people standing around a wooden table in a room with flags on the walls and a tv on the w

Background on the Tribunal Electoral del Poder Judicial de la Federación (TEPJF)

The Tribunal Electoral del Poder Judicial de la Federación (TEPJF) is Mexico’s highest electoral tribunal, responsible for overseeing federal elections and resolving disputes related to the electoral process. Its decisions significantly impact the country’s political landscape.

Zacatecas Magistrates’ Election Validation

In a virtual session, the TEPJF’s Superior Chamber upheld the election of members for the Civil Sala of the State Superior Tribunal in Zacatecas, despite allegations of “rosy accordion” interference and complaints about candidates failing to meet the minimum 9% average for their specialty.

Magistrate Janine Otálora’s Proposal

Magistrate Janine Otálora proposed revoking the validity declaration of the Magistrates’ election for the Tribunal Superior de Justicia in Zacatecas due to parity and eligibility concerns regarding two elected magistrates. Her proposal was based on the principles of relative majority.

Otálora Malassis emphasized that the Civil Sala of the State Superior Tribunal was formed according to a paritary vote, resulting in 50 male and 50 female members deemed eligible.

Impugnation and TEPJF’s Decision

The election results were challenged through a citizens’ lawsuit, with complainants questioning parity and the eligibility of two elected candidates. One candidate was accused of lacking proper evaluation to meet the 9% average requirement, while the other was allegedly part of a “rosy accordion” – an informal group supposedly influencing the election process.

Otálora proposed revoking the initial ruling to allow the local tribunal to reassess whether the OPLE (Local Electoral Commission) properly evaluated the average requirement considering candidate committees and the evaluation committee.

Absent Magistrates During the Session

Newly elected magistrates Gilberto de Guzmán Bátiz García and Claudia Valle Aguilasocho excused themselves from discussing the case, while Magistrate Reyes Rodriguez Mondrágon remained on vacation during the session.

Dismissal of San Luis Potosí Challenges

The TEPJF plenary also dismissed various appeals against the election of local judges and magistrates in San Luis Potosí, citing that the challenges were filed out of time.

Key Questions and Answers

  • What is the Tribunal Electoral del Poder Judicial de la Federación (TEPJF)? The TEPJF is Mexico’s highest electoral tribunal, responsible for overseeing federal elections and resolving disputes related to the electoral process.
  • What were the allegations against the Zacatecas magistrates’ election? Allegations included “rosy accordion” interference and candidates failing to meet the minimum 9% average for their specialty.
  • Who proposed revoking the validity declaration of the Zacatecas magistrates’ election? Magistrate Janine Otálora proposed revoking the declaration due to parity and eligibility concerns regarding two elected magistrates.
  • Why were the San Luis Potosí challenges dismissed? The challenges were dismissed because they were filed out of time.