US Government Seeks Dismantling of Google’s Online Advertising Business

Web Editor

May 2, 2025

a person holding a cell phone with the google logo on it's screen and a hand touching the screen, Aq

Background on the Case

The US government has requested a federal judge to order the dismantling of Google’s internet advertising business following its conviction for anti-competitive practices.

Key Players and Relevance

Google, a subsidiary of Alphabet Inc., is one of the world’s most influential technology companies. Its dominance in online advertising has raised concerns about monopolistic practices and stifling competition. The US Department of Justice, led by Representative Julia Tarver, is taking action to address these concerns.

Arguments and Proposed Actions

During a hearing in Alexandria, Virginia, Tarver argued that Google had already found ways to circumvent the law. She urged the judge to dismiss Google’s promise to change its advertising practices, stating that “allowing a recidivist monopolist to remain intact is not the solution.”

This lawsuit marks the second request from the US government, which also demands that Google divest its Chrome browser.

Anti-Competitive Practices

The court found Google guilty of controlling the online advertising market through website banners. The recent hearing in a Virginia courtroom was to plan the second phase of the trial, set for September, where measures will be determined to prevent Google from monopolizing this business again.

Key Questions and Answers

  • What is the main issue in this case? The US government alleges that Google has engaged in anti-competitive practices, specifically in the online advertising market.
  • Who is involved in this case? The US Department of Justice, represented by Julia Tarver, is taking legal action against Google.
  • What specific actions does the government want Google to take? The government seeks to dismantle Google’s online advertising business and also demands that Google divest its Chrome browser.
  • Why is this case significant? This case has the potential to reshape the digital advertising landscape and promote competition among technology companies.